Jackson v. Indiana State Prison et al
| Jarvis T Jackson |
| Indiana State Prison, Buss, Ron Neal, Joshua Wallen, Todd Wolfword, Tiffany, Fritter, Karen, Tanya and Faye |
| INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only) |
| 3:2022cv00894 |
| October 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Jon E DeGuilio |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
OPINION AND ORDER: The court GRANTS Jarvis T. Jackson until 1/17/2023, to file an amended complaint and CAUTIONS Jarvis T. Jackson if he does not respond by the deadline, this case will be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. 1915A without further notice because the current complaint does not state a claim for which relief can be granted. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 12/19/2022. (mrm)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The court WAIVES the initial partial filing fee, ORDERS the plaintiff, Jarvis T. Jackson, IDOC # 124252, to pay (and the facility having custody to automatically remit) to the clerk 20% of the money received for each calendar month during which $10.00 or more is received, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full, DIRECTS the clerk to create a ledger for receipt of these funds and DIRECTS the clerk to send a copy of this order to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 11/15/22. (Copy mailed as directed in Order). (nal)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff Jarvis T Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nae)
|
|
Filing 3
Consent to Receipt of Documents Through Prisoner Electronic Filing Program by Jarvis T Jackson. The Prisoner Electronic Filing Program operates pursuant to General Order 2018-1. When an inmate submits a document for electronic filing, the Prison Law Library emails a scanned copy and mails the original to the Court. The inmate should not mail a paper copy to the Court or a Defendant. When the scanned copy is docketed by the Court, a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) is emailed to the Prison Law Library. This NEF is printed by the Prison Law Library and given to the inmate with only the first page of the inmate's filing. Defendants are served by the Court. When the Prison Law Library receives an NEF for an entry by the Court, the NEF and a full copy of any attached order or document is printed and given to the inmate. The Prison Law Library will not print the NEF for documents filed by a Defendant. The Defendant must serve the inmate by mail. (nae)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Jarvis T. Jackson is GRANTED until 12/1/2022, to respond to this order and CAUTIONED if he does not respond by the deadline, this case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 10/31/22. (Copy mailed to pro se party). (nhc)
|
|
Filing 1
PRO SE COMPLAINT against Buss, Faye, Fritter, Indiana State Prison, Karen, Ron Neal, Tanya, Tiffany, Joshua Wallen, Todd Wolfword, filed by Jarvis T Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(No filing fee or IFP received)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Jackson)(kmt)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
