Nellist v. Indiana Dept of Corrections et al
| John D Nellist and John David Nellist |
| William Hyatte, Indiana Dept of Corrections, Bill, George Payne and Michael Gapski |
| MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only) |
| 3:2022cv00921 |
| November 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Jon E DeGuilio |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
REQUEST for Production of Documents to a Party, by John D Nellist. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(shk)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION to Tender Documents by Plaintiff John D Nellist. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(shk)
|
|
Filing 6
Consent to Receipt of Documents Through Prisoner Electronic Filing Program by John D Nellist. The Prisoner Electronic Filing Program operates pursuant to General Order 2018-1. When an inmate submits a document for electronic filing, the Prison Law Library emails a scanned copy and mails the original to the Court. The inmate should not mail a paper copy to the Court or a Defendant. When the scanned copy is docketed by the Court, a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) is emailed to the Prison Law Library. This NEF is printed by the Prison Law Library and given to the inmate with only the first page of the inmate's filing. Defendants are served by the Court. When the Prison Law Library receives an NEF for an entry by the Court, the NEF and a full copy of any attached order or document is printed and given to the inmate. The Prison Law Library will not print the NEF for documents filed by a Defendant. The Defendant must serve the inmate by mail. (nhc)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER denying #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 11/14/22. (Copy mailed to pro se party). (nal)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; ORDERS the plaintiff, John D. Nellist, IDOC # 988434, to immediately pay (and the facility having custody to automatically remit) $4.42 to the clerk in payment of the initial partial filing fee; ORDERS the plaintiff to pay (and the facility having custody to automatically remit) to the clerk 20% of the money received for each calendar month during which $10.00 or more is received, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full; DIRECTS the clerk to create a ledger for receipt of these funds; and DIRECTS the clerk to send a copy of this order to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 11/10/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se part and Miami Correctional Facility as directed in Order). (nhc)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Plaintiff John D Nellist. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Clean copy of Motion for Appointment of Counsel, #3 Clean copy of Cover Letter)(kmt)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff John D Nellist. (Attachments: #1 Clean Copy of IFP)(kmt)
|
|
Filing 1
PRO SE COMPLAINT against Michael Gapski, William Hyatte, Indiana Dept of Corrections, George Payne, filed by John D Nellist. (Attachments: #1 Clean Copy of Complaint, #2 Envelope from Law Library)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Nellist)(kmt)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
