Crockett III v. Warden
Petitioner: William Crockett III and William Bernard Crockett
Respondent: Warden
Case Number: 3:2022cv00945
Filed: November 7, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Michael G Gotsch
Referring Judge: Damon R Leichty
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER DENYING #6 Motion to Amend by Petitioner William Crockett III as outlined in order. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 1/4/2023. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(mrm)
January 3, 2023 Filing 9 MOTION for More Definite Statement as a Matter of Law, Pure Law, Legal Sufficency by Petitioner William Crockett III. (Case Number 2:22-cv-330 is listed) (Attachment: #1 Envelope)(jdb)
December 5, 2022 Filing 7 Letter re #6 Motion to Amend from William Crockett III. (no case number included). (nhc)
December 5, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION to Amend by Petitioner William Crockett III. (Attachment: #1 Envelope). (incorrect case number of 2:22-cv-330 included in filing). (nhc)
November 22, 2022 Filing 5 CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(sej)
November 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: The petition #1 is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. The petitioner is CAUTIONED that the filing of additional unauthorized successive habeas petitions challenging his murder conviction in St. Joseph County under case number 71D01-0310-MR-27 may result in the imposition of monetary sanctions or filing restrictions. The clerk is DIRECTED to close this case. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 11/21/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(sej)
November 18, 2022 Filing 3 (unsigned) MOTION to Correct Fundamental Error of Law by Petitioner William Crockett III (no case number included). (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope). (nhc)
November 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: The Court hereby DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case and OPEN a new case with these filings in the South Bend Division. New Case No. 3:22-cv-945; Judge Damon R. Leichty and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 11/10/2022. (Copy mailed with docket sheet to pro se party) (jdb)
November 7, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5; Receipt #2025546), filed by William Crockett III. (Attachment: #1 Envelope)(jdb) (Copy of docket sheet sent to Crockett with case number)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crockett III v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: William Crockett III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: William Bernard Crockett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?