Densmore v. City of Knox et al
Michael Densmore |
City of Knox, Officer Charles Leonhardt and Knox, Indiana City of |
3:2022cv00987 |
December 1, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Michael G Gotsch |
Damon R Leichty |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael Densmore. Knox, Indiana City of served on 12/6/2022, answer due 12/27/2022. (Schocke, Mark) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael Densmore. Charles Leonhardt served on 12/5/2022, answer due 12/27/2022. (Schocke, Mark) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Knox, Indiana City of, Charles Leonhardt. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (Attachments: #1 City of Knox)(ash) |
Judge Damon R Leichty and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr added.**NEW CASE** (ash) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AINNDC-5093338.), filed by Michael Densmore. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Summons City of Knox, #3 Proposed Summons Summons Officer Charles Leonhardt)(Schocke, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.