Enright v. Amazon.com, Inc.
Bret Enright |
Bret Enbright and Amazon.com, Inc. |
Daniel J Palmer |
3:2023cv00024 |
January 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Jon E DeGuilio |
Michael G Gotsch |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 REPORT by Bret Enright of Mediator Selection. (Schafer, Tracey) |
|
Filing 11 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Schafer, Tracey) |
Filing 10 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties.. (slm) |
|
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Tracey Lynn Steele Schafer on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Schafer, Tracey) |
Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr added. **NEW CASE** (rmc) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AINNDC-5128834.), filed by Amazon.com, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Docket, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(DeVries, Edward) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Philip G Rizzo on behalf of Amazon.com, Inc. (Rizzo, Philip) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Edward A DeVries on behalf of Amazon.com, Inc. (DeVries, Edward) |
Filing 1 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Amazon.com, Inc.. (Rizzo, Philip) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.