Sewell v. Warden
Petitioner: Theodis Sewell and Theodis J Sewell
Respondent: Warden
Case Number: 3:2023cv00049
Filed: January 24, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Jon E DeGuilio
Referring Judge: Michael G Gotsch
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 8, 2023 Filing 8 MOTION to Notify by Petitioner Theodis Sewell.(Contacted Westville Correctional Facility for a cleaner copy) (kmt) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/23/2023: #1 Cleaner copy of Main Document) (kmt).
February 28, 2023 Filing 7 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties. (Copy mailed to pro se party and Superintendent). Magistrate Consent forms due by 3/21/2023. (slm)
February 27, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Natalie F Weiss on behalf of Warden (Weiss, Natalie)
February 27, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Natalie F Weiss on behalf of Warden (Weiss, Natalie) ***REFILED AT #6 *** Modified on 2/27/2023 (ace).
February 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Under Section 2254 Habeas Corpus Rule 5, the respondent is ORDERED to enter an appearance by 02/27/2023, and file a response to the petition with the entire administrative record by 04/17/2023. Mr. Sewell's traverse, should he choose to file one, shall be due by 05/19/2023. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 02/06/2023. (Copy mailed to pro se party and Warden) (jdb)
February 6, 2023 Filing 3 Filing fee received: $ 5.00, receipt number 466. (kmt)
February 6, 2023 ***Deficiency Deadline terminated. (kmt)
January 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER The Court GRANTS the petitioner to and including February 27, 2023, to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis accompanied by a certified copy of his trust fund ledgers for the past six months; and CAUTIONS him that if he does not respond by the deadline, this case is subject to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 1/26/23. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(mlc)
January 24, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Theodis Sewell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(No filing fee or IFP received)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Sewell)(kmt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sewell v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Theodis Sewell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Theodis J Sewell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Represented By: Natalie F Weiss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?