Farmer v. Neals et al
| Darrell Farmer and Darrell A Farmer |
| Ron Neals and L Smith |
| 3:2023cv00078 |
| January 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Robert L Miller |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. WAIVING the initial partial filing fee; ORDERING the plaintiff, Darrell Farmer, IDOC # 198299, to pay (and the facility having custody to automatically remit) to the clerk 20% of the money received for each calendar month during which $10.00 or more is received, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full; DIRECTING the clerk to create a ledger for receipt of these funds; and DIRECTING the clerk to send a copy of this order to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 2/2/2023. (Copy mailed to pro se party and Inmate Trust Fund Acct @ ISP)(mrm)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff Darrell Farmer. (kmt)
|
|
Filing 1
PRO SE COMPLAINT against Ron Neals, L Smith, filed by Darrell Farmer. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Farmer)(kmt)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
