Mercado v. Warden
| Leobardo Mercado |
| Warden Dennis Reagle |
| Warden and Dennis Reagle |
| 3:2023cv00228 |
| March 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Robert L Miller |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties.. Magistrate Consent forms due by 4/18/2023. (slm)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Kelly A Loy on behalf of Warden (Loy, Kelly)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Pursuant to Section 2254 Habeas Corpus Rule 5, the respondent is ORDERED to enter an appearance by 4/21/2023, and to file a response to the petition along with the complete state court record by 6/23/2023. The petitioner's traverse, should he choose to file one, shall be due by 7/24/2023. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 3/22/2023. (ash)
|
|
**NEW CASE** Judge Robert L Miller, Jr and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr added. (kmt)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Michael K Ausbrook on behalf of Leobardo Mercado (Ausbrook, Michael)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number AINNDC-5193295.), filed by Leobardo Mercado. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ausbrook, Michael)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
