Cleveland et al v. Davis et al
| Donna J. Cleveland, Ronald Cleveland, Michele A Cleveland, Lacey N. Frye and L. N. F |
| Richard L Davis, The Kaplan Trucking Company and Kaplan Trucking Company The |
| 3:2023cv00313 |
| April 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Damon R Leichty |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties.. (slm) |
Filing 14
ORDER, Joint Proposed Discovery due by 6/29/2023. Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 7/25/2023 11:30 AM in US District Court - South Bend before Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch Sr.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 6/9/23. (slm)
|
| ***Jurisdictional Statement Deadline terminated per #13 . (ash) |
| Filing 13 STATEMENT Supplemental Jurisdictional Statement regarding #8 Notice of Removal, filed by Kaplan Trucking Company The, Richard L Davis, #7 Order,,, Set Deadlines,,. (Meyer, John) |
| Filing 12 REDACTED ANSWER to Complaint by Richard L Davis, Kaplan Trucking Company The.(Meyer, John) |
| Filing 11 AGREED NOTICE to extend time to file answer filed by Richard L Davis, Kaplan Trucking Company The ; answer due by 5-26-23. (Meyer, John) |
| Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Richard L Davis, Kaplan Trucking Company The. (Meyer, John) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by John D Meyer on behalf of Richard L Davis, Kaplan Trucking Company The (Meyer, John) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF REMOVAL REDACTED from Elkhart Superior Court, Cause No. 20D02-2303-CT-000088, filed by Kaplan Trucking Company The, Richard L Davis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-State Court Record Redacted, #2 Exhibit 2-Notice to State Court Redacted, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Meyer, John) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: The Court ORDERS Defendants to file a supplemental jurisdictional statement that properly alleges the citizenship of each party to this action by 06/06/2023. The Clerk is DIRECTED to maintain the original documents including the minor's name #1 , #2 , #3 , #4 , #5 , #6 under seal. The parties are further ORDERED to file redacted versions of the following documents and any attached exhibits no later than 06/06/2023 as outlined in this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 05/23/2023. (jdb)
|
| Filing 6 Defendants ANSWER to #4 State Court Complaint by Richard L Davis, Kaplan Trucking Company The.(Meyer, John) Modified on 5/24/2023 to edit text (mlc). |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer due 5/26/2023 per #5 . (nhc) |
| Filing 5 AGREED NOTICE to extend time to file answer filed by Richard L Davis, Kaplan Trucking Company The ; answer due by May 26, 2023. (Meyer, John) |
| Judge Damon R Leichty and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr added. **NEW CASE** (ash) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by The Kaplan Trucking Company. (Meyer, John) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by John D Meyer on behalf of All Defendants (Meyer, John) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AINNDC-5222719.) from Elkhart Superior Court, Cause No. 20D02-2303-CT-000088, filed by The Kaplan Trucking Company, Richard L Davis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-State Court Record, #2 Exhibit 2-Notice to State Court, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Meyer, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
