LaCroix v. Neal et al
| Terry LaCroix and Terry Lynn LaCroix |
| Ron Neal, Dustin, Wolfred, Wheeler and Police Investigator |
| INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only) |
| 3:2023cv00315 |
| April 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Damon R Leichty |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
Partial Initial Partial Filing fee received: $ 1.69, receipt number SB 1227. (kmt)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; ORDERS the plaintiff, Terry LaCroix, IDOC # 246389, to immediately pay (and the facility having custody to automatically remit) $7.70 to the clerk in payment of the initial partial filing fee; ORDERS the plaintiff to pay (and the facility having custody to automatically remit) to the clerk 20% of the money received for each calendar month during which $10.00 or more is received, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full; DIRECTS the clerk to create a ledger for receipt of these funds; and DIRECTS the clerk to send a copy of this order to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 5/15/2023. (Copy mailed as directed in Order). (nhc)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff Terry LaCroix. (kmt)
|
|
***Deficiency Deadline terminated. (kmt)
|
|
Filing 4
Consent to Receipt of Documents Through Prisoner Electronic Filing Program by Terry LaCroix. The Prisoner Electronic Filing Program operates pursuant to General Order 2018-1. When an inmate submits a document for electronic filing, the Prison Law Library emails a scanned copy and mails the original to the Court. The inmate should not mail a paper copy to the Court or a Defendant. When the scanned copy is docketed by the Court, a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) is emailed to the Prison Law Library. This NEF is printed by the Prison Law Library and given to the inmate with only the first page of the inmate's filing. Defendants are served by the Court. When the Prison Law Library receives an NEF for an entry by the Court, the NEF and a full copy of any attached order or document is printed and given to the inmate. The Prison Law Library will not print the NEF for documents filed by a Defendant. The Defendant must serve the inmate by mail. (kmt)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER: The court DENIES the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 without prejudice; GRANTS the plaintiff until 05/25/2023, to either pay the filing fee or file an in forma pauperis motion accompanied by a certified copy of his trust fund ledgers for the past six months; and CAUTIONS him that if he does not respond by the deadline, this case is subject to dismissal without further notice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 04/25/2023. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (jdb)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Terry LaCroix. (kmt)
|
|
Filing 1
PRO SE COMPLAINT against Dustin, Ron Neal, Police Investigator(Co, name unknown), Wheeler, Wolfred, filed by Terry LaCroix. (File stamped copy with case number sent to LaCroix)(kmt)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
