Martin v. Indiana Department of Education
Cody Allen Martin |
Indiana Department of Education and Indiana Education |
3:2023cv00516 |
June 2, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Michael G Gotsch |
Damon R Leichty |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER DENYING without prejudice #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Cody Allen Martin. AFFORDING Mr. Martin leave to amend his complaint to become compliant with the federal rules and refile a motion to proceed in forma pauperis by 6/27/2023, and CAUTIONING him that failure to comply with this deadline, plead federal jurisdiction, pay the filing fee or file for in forma pauperis status, or file a rule-compliant complaint will result in the dismissal of his case without further notice because his current complaint doesnt state a claim or a basis for jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 6/12/2023. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(mrm) |
Filing 2 (Unsigned) MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Cody Allen Martin. (kmt) |
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Indiana Department of Education, filed by Cody Allen Martin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(kmt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.