Suggs v. Cotter et al
Plaintiff: Kendrick Cordell Suggs
Defendant: Kenneth P Cotter, Sherece M Love and Lisa Jones
Case Number: 3:2023cv00674
Filed: July 17, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: James T Moody
Referring Judge: Andrew P Rodovich
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: The court ORDERS Kendrick Cordell Suggs to show cause by 09/25/2023, as to why this case should not be dismissed for not promptly notifying the court of his new address; and CAUTIONS Kendrick Cordell Suggs that, if he does not respond by that deadline, this case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 09/01/2023. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (jdb)
September 1, 2023 Filing 4 Mail Returned from Kendrick Cordell Suggs as Undeliverable - #3 Order Directing Prisoner Payment. Envelope marked - Released 8/21/23, Not in Custody, Return to Sender. (sej)
August 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; ORDERING Plaintiff, Kendrick Cordell Suggs, IDOC # 223630, St. Joseph County Jail # 126486, to immediately pay $42.00 to the clerk in payment of the initial partial filing fee; ORDERING Plaintiff to pay to the clerk 20% of the money received for each calendar month during which $10.00 or more is received, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full; and DIRECTING the clerk to create a ledger for receipt of these funds and to send a copy of this order to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 8/23/2023. (Copy mailed to pro se party and St Joseph CJ Inmate Trust Fund Acct as directed in Order)(mrm)
July 17, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff Kendrick Cordell Suggs. (kmt)
July 17, 2023 Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Kenneth P Cotter, Lisa Jones, Sherece M Love, filed by Kendrick Cordell Suggs. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Suggs)(kmt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Suggs v. Cotter et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kendrick Cordell Suggs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kenneth P Cotter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sherece M Love
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lisa Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?