White v. Neal et al
| William L White, Jr |
| Ronald Neal, Robert Carter, Jr and Pamela Bane |
| INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only) |
| 3:2023cv00739 |
| July 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Holly A Brady |
| Susan L Collins |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
OPINION AND ORDER: The court GRANTS the plaintiff until 10/16/2023, to file an amended complaint; and CAUTIONS him that if he does not respond by the deadline, this case is subject to dismissal under 28 U.S.C. 1915A because the current complaint does not state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Signed by Chief Judge Holly A Brady on 09/18/2023. (jdb)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; WAIVES the initial partial filing fee; ORDERS the plaintiff, William L. White, Jr., IDOC # 156546, to pay (and the facility having custody to automatically remit) to the clerk 20% of the money received for each calendar month during which $10.00 or more is received, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full; DIRECTS the clerk to create a ledger for receipt of these funds; and DIRECTS the clerk to send a copy of this order to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Chief Judge Holly A Brady on 9/12/2023. (Copy mailed to Indiana State Prison as directed in Order). (nhc)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached), titled as Motion for Fee Waiver, by Plaintiff William L White, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(kmt)
|
|
Filing 3
Consent to Receipt of Documents Through Prisoner Electronic Filing Program by William L White, Jr. The Prisoner Electronic Filing Program operates pursuant to General Order 2018-1. When an inmate submits a document for electronic filing, the Prison Law Library emails a scanned copy and mails the original to the Court. The inmate should not mail a paper copy to the Court or a Defendant. When the scanned copy is docketed by the Court, a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) is emailed to the Prison Law Library. This NEF is printed by the Prison Law Library and given to the inmate with only the first page of the inmate's filing. Defendants are served by the Court. When the Prison Law Library receives an NEF for an entry by the Court, the NEF and a full copy of any attached order or document is printed and given to the inmate. The Prison Law Library will not print the NEF for documents filed by a Defendant. The Defendant must serve the inmate by mail. (kmt)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER: The Court GRANTS Plaintiff until 9/13/2023, to either pay the filing fee in full or move for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and CAUTIONS him that if he does not respond by the deadline, this case is subject to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 8/14/2023. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(mrm)
|
|
Filing 1
PRO SE COMPLAINT against Pamela Bane, Robert Carter, Jr, Ronald Neal, filed by William L White, Jr. (No filing fee or IFP received) (File stamped 7/31/2023 by ISP, e-file not received by court. Paper copy scanned 8/4/2023) (File stamped copy with case number sent to White)(kmt)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
