Anderson v. Meridian Radiology et al
| Nathan Anderson and Nathan A. Anderson |
| Meridian Radiology and Carl E Kuenzli |
| WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only) |
| 3:2023cv00777 |
| August 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| John E Martin |
| Philip P Simon |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER DENYING #8 Verified Motion for Appointment of Counsel by Plaintiff Nathan Anderson as outlined in order. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 9/20/2023. (mrm)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Nathan Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Indigency, #2 Exhibit)(nae)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING #2 , #6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Nathan Anderson. ORDERING Plaintiff, Nathan Anderson, IDOC # 219213 to immediately pay $2.74 to the clerk in payment of the initial partial filing fee. ORDERING Plaintiff to pay to the clerk 20% of the money received for each calendar month during which $10.00 or more is received, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full; and DIRECTING the clerk to create a ledger for receipt of these funds and to send a copy of this order to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 9/14/2023. (Copy mailed to Wabash Valley CF, Inmate Trust Fund Acct. as directed in Order)(mrm)
|
|
Filing 6
Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Nathan Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Copy of DE #3 )(kmt)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Change of Address by Nathan Anderson from Miami Correctional Facility to Wabash Valley Correctional Facility pursuant to DE #4 . (kmt)
|
|
Filing 4
Consent to Receipt of Documents Through Prisoner Electronic Filing Program by Nathan Anderson. The Prisoner Electronic Filing Program operates pursuant to General Order 2018-1. When an inmate submits a document for electronic filing, the Prison Law Library emails a scanned copy and mails the original to the Court. The inmate should not mail a paper copy to the Court or a Defendant. When the scanned copy is docketed by the Court, a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) is emailed to the Prison Law Library. This NEF is printed by the Prison Law Library and given to the inmate with only the first page of the inmate's filing. Defendants are served by the Court. When the Prison Law Library receives an NEF for an entry by the Court, the NEF and a full copy of any attached order or document is printed and given to the inmate. The Prison Law Library will not print the NEF for documents filed by a Defendant. The Defendant must serve the inmate by mail. (kmt)
|
|
***Response Deadline terminated. (kmt)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER: The Court GRANTS Nathan Anderson until 9/26/2023, to respond to this order and CAUTIONS him that if he does not respond by the deadline, this case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 8/22/2023. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(mrm)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Nathan Anderson. (nae)
|
|
Filing 1
PRO SE COMPLAINT against Carl E Kuenzli, Meridian Radiology, filed by Nathan Anderson. (Returned file stamped copy with case number to Anderson) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope)(nae) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/23/2023: #3 Corrected copy of complaint) (nae).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
