Ali v. Mygrant et al
| Mufti Abdul El-Malik-Bey Ali and Frances L Smit-Bey |
| Dennis Mygrant, T Sykes, K Meyers and S Lapoint |
| MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only) |
| 3:2023cv00885 |
| October 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Andrew P Rodovich |
| Philip P Simon |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Amend and the deadline is ENLARGED to 1/17/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 11/22/23. (nhc)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to Amend #1 Pro Se Complaint by Plaintiff Mufti Abdul El-Malik-Bey Ali. (Captioned in error as 3:23-cv-85) (nae) |
| Filing 5 Consent to Receipt of Documents Through Prisoner Electronic Filing Program by Mufti Abdul El-Malik-Bey Ali. The Prisoner Electronic Filing Program operates pursuant to General Order 2018-1. When an inmate submits a document for electronic filing, the Prison Law Library emails a scanned copy and mails the original to the Court. The inmate should not mail a paper copy to the Court or a Defendant. When the scanned copy is docketed by the Court, a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) is emailed to the Prison Law Library. This NEF is printed by the Prison Law Library and given to the inmate with only the first page of the inmate's filing. Defendants are served by the Court. When the Prison Law Library receives an NEF for an entry by the Court, the NEF and a full copy of any attached order or document is printed and given to the inmate. The Prison Law Library will not print the NEF for documents filed by a Defendant. The Defendant must serve the inmate by mail. (kmt) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to place this case number on a blank Pro Se 14 (INND Rev. 2/20) Prisoner Complaint form and send it to Mufti Abdul El-Malik-Bey Ali; and GRANTS Mufti Abdul El-Malik-Bey Ali until 11/21/2023, to file an amended complaint on that form. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 10/17/2023. (Copy mailed to pro se party as directed in Order). (nhc)
|
| Judge Philip P Simon added. Judge Theresa L Springmann no longer assigned to case. (nae) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; ORDERS the Plaintiff, Mufti Abdul El-Malik-Bey Ali, IDOC # 955755, to immediately pay (and the facility having custody to automatically remit) $15.60 to the Clerk of Court in payment of the initial partial filing fee; ORDERS the Plaintiff to pay (and the facility having custody to automatically remit) to the Clerk of Court 20% of the money received for each calendar month during which $10.00 or more is received, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full; DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to create a ledger for receipt of these funds; andDIRECTS the Clerk of Court to send a copy of this order to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 10/3/2023. (Copy mailed to pro se party and Miami Correctional Facility as directed in Order). (nhc)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff Mufti Abdul El-Malik-Bey Ali. (kmt) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against S Lapoint, K Meyers, Dennis Mygrant, T Sykes, filed by Mufti Abdul El-Malik-Bey Ali. (File stamped copy with case number sent to Ali)(kmt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
