Phelps v. Neal et al
| Cody Phelps and Cody W Phelps |
| Ron Neal, Dawn Buss, Casaneda, R Neal, D Buss, L Smith, Caseneda, Wheeler, Stone, Batsel and J Snyder |
| 3:2023cv00920 |
| October 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| John E Martin |
| James T Moody |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, titled as Motion to Show Cause, filed by Cody W Phelps. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(kmt) |
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: The court ORDERS Cody W. Phelps to SHOW CAUSE by 11/30/2023, why he should not be fined or sanctioned, up to and including dismissal of this case, for submitting what appears to be a fraudulent, falsified, and/or deceptive in forma pauperis motion #2 . Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 10/31/23. (Copy mailed to pro se party). (nhc)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff Cody Phelps. (kmt) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Batsel, Dawn Buss, Casaneda, Ron Neal, L Smith, J Snyder, Stone, Wheeler, filed by Cody Phelps. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Phelps)(kmt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
