Alexander v. Warden
| Michael Derrick Alexander and Michael D Alexander |
| Warden |
| 3:2023cv00947 |
| October 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| John E Martin |
| James T Moody |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (Copy mailed to pro se party). (nhc) |
Filing 5
ORDER: The court DISMISSES this case without prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 12/19/2023. (Copy mailed to pro se party). (nhc)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER: The Court GRANTS Michael Derrick Alexander until 12/1/2023, to file an amended petition or a motion to dismiss consistent with this Order and CAUTIONS Michael Derrick Alexander that, if he does not respond by this deadline, this case will be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 11/6/2023. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(mrm)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Assistance with Recruiting Counsel by Petitioner Michael Derrick Alexander. (kmt) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Michael Derrick Alexander. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(kmt) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Michael Derrick Alexander. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Alexander)(kmt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
