Grantham v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Charles Grantham |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| General Counsel SSA (Court use only) |
| 3:2023cv01076 |
| December 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Philip P Simon |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER: Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Grantham's motion #5 is GRANTED and this action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is DIRECTED to administratively close the case. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 1/10/2024. (ash)
|
| Filing 5 First MOTION to Dismiss Voluntarily by Plaintiff Charles Grantham. (Richter, Matthew) |
| Judge Philip P Simon and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr added. (NEW CASE, MOTION PENDING) (jld) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas T Lavella on behalf of Charles Grantham (Lavella, Nicholas) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew F Richter on behalf of Charles Grantham (Richter, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Charles Grantham. (Richter, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Charles Grantham. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Richter, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
