Rogers et al v. Pike Bokhari
Plaintiff: Michael Rogers and Neda Louise Rogers
Defendant: Laith Pike Bokhari
Not Classified By Court: Neal Bemenderfer
Case Number: 3:2023cv01077
Filed: December 15, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Michael G Gotsch
Referring Judge: Damon R Leichty
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 15 SCHEDULING ORDER: The Court now enters the instant Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order regarding the conduct of discovery and deadlines as follows: The parties will exchange the information required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) by 3/15/2024. The last date to amend the pleadings without leave of court as to plaintiff(s) is 7/1/2024; as to defendant(s) is 8/1/2024. The serving of reports from retained experts under Rule 26(a)(2) are due from plaintiff(s) by 7/31/2024; and from defendant(s) by 9/3/2024. Supplementation under Rule 26(e) is due every six weeks until trial. The last date for the completion of ALL DISCOVERY is 2/3/2025. The deadline to file any discovery-related nondispositive motion is 1/6/2025. The deadline to file any dispositive motions is 3/3/2025, with any response due 28 days thereafter and any reply due 14 days after the filing of a response, consistent with N.D. Ind. L.R. 56-1(b)-(c). The parties have agreed upon Neal Bemenderfer as mediator. The deadline for the parties to engage in mediation is 2/21/2025. The Court hereby VACATES the Preliminary Pretrial Conference scheduled for 3/8/2024, at 11:45 a.m. EST. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 2/12/2024. (sej)
February 7, 2024 Filing 14 REPORT by Michael Rogers, Neda Louise Rogers Report of the Parties' Planning Meeting. (Zalas, Clint)
January 19, 2024 Filing 13 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties.. (slm)
January 19, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER, Joint Proposed Discovery due by 2/8/2024. Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 3/8/2024 11:45 AM in US District Court - South Bend before Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch Sr.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 1/19/24. (slm)
January 16, 2024 ***Answer Deadline terminated. (jdb)
January 12, 2024 Filing 11 ANSWER to #3 Complaint by Laith Pike Bokhari.(Halstead, John) Modified on 1/18/2024 to link to complaint (mlc).
January 2, 2024 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by George E Horn, Jr on behalf of Laith Pike Bokhari (Horn, George)
January 2, 2024 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy J Maher on behalf of Laith Pike Bokhari (Maher, Timothy)
December 27, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeremy J McDonald on behalf of All Plaintiffs (McDonald, Jeremy)
December 27, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Clint A Zalas on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Zalas, Clint)
December 27, 2023 Set/Reset Deadlines: Dft Laith Pike Bokhari answer deadline extended to 1/12/24 per NOTICE #6 . (sej)
December 22, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE by Laith Pike Bokhari re #3 State Court Complaint of Automatic Extension of Time (Halstead, John)
December 19, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Corban J Cavanaugh on behalf of Laith Pike Bokhari (Cavanaugh, Corban)
December 19, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Renee J Mortimer on behalf of Laith Pike Bokhari (Mortimer, Renee)
December 18, 2023 **NEW CASE** Judge Damon R Leichty and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr added. (nhc)
December 15, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by John H Halstead on behalf of Laith Pike Bokhari (Halstead, John)
December 15, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AINNDC-5439734.) from St. Joseph Superior Court, Cause No. 71D06-2311-CT-000568, filed by Laith Pike Bokhari. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Halstead, John)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rogers et al v. Pike Bokhari
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Rogers
Represented By: Clint A Zalas
Represented By: Jeremy J McDonald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Neda Louise Rogers
Represented By: Clint A Zalas
Represented By: Jeremy J McDonald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Laith Pike Bokhari
Represented By: John H Halstead
Represented By: Corban J Cavanaugh
Represented By: Renee J Mortimer
Represented By: Timothy J Maher
Represented By: George E Horn, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: Neal Bemenderfer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?