Carter v. Miami Correctional Facility et al
| Kareem O Carter |
| Miami Correctional Facility, Morgan, English and Jane Doe |
| 3:2024cv00289 |
| April 9, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Joseph S Van Bokkelen |
| Andrew P Rodovich |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
NOTICE of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of Summons sent to Captain Morgan. Waiver of Service due by 6/17/2024. (Attachments: #1 Order, #2 Amended Complaint) (ash)
|
|
Filing 7
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS Kareem O. Carter leave to proceed against Captain Morgan in his individual capacity for compensatory and punitive damages for subjecting him to excessive force on one occasion at the Miami Correctional Facility during the fall of 2023 in violation of the Eighth Amendment; DISMISSES all other claims; DISMISSES Warden English; DIRECTS the clerk, under 28 U.S.C. 1915(d), to request Waiver of Service from (and if necessary, the United States Marshals Service to use any lawful means to locate and serve process on) Captain Morgan at the Indiana Department of Correction, with a copy of this order and the amended complaint (ECF #6 ); ORDERS the Indiana Department of Correction to provide the full name, date of birth, and last known home address of any defendant who does not waive service if it has such information; and ORDERS, under 42 U.S.C. 1997e(g)(2), Captain Morgan to respond, as provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and N.D. Ind. L.R. 10-1(b), only to the claims for which the plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in this screening order. Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 5/16/2024. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ash)
|
|
Filing 6
AMENDED COMPLAINT against English, Morgan, filed by Kareem O Carter.(eeb)
|
|
Filing 5
Initial Filing fee: $ 46.12, receipt number SB 3203 (nae)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; ORDERING Plaintiff, Kareem O. Carter, IDOC # 285012 to immediately pay $46.12 to the clerk in payment of the initial partial filing fee; ORDERING Plaintiff to pay to the clerk 20% of the money received for each calendar month during which $10.00 or more is received, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full; and DIRECTING the clerk to create a ledger for receipt of these funds and to send a copy of this order to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 4/15/2024. (Copy mailed to pro se party and Inmate Trust Fund Acct @ Miami CF)(mrm)
|
|
Filing 3
OPINION AND ORDER: The court GRANTS Kareem O. Carter until 5/15/2024, to file an amended complaint that contains only related claims as described and CAUTIONS Kareem O. Carter if he does not respond by the deadline, or if he files an amended complaint with unrelated claims, the court may select one group of related claims and dismiss the others without prejudice. Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 4/15/2024. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(mrm)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff Kareem O Carter. (nae)
|
|
Filing 1
PRO SE COMPLAINT against Jane Doe, Jane Doe, English, Miami Correctional Facility, Morgan, filed by Kareem O Carter. (Copy with case number returned to Carter) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(nae)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
