American Technology Components, Inc. et al v. Ayro, Inc.
| American Technology Components, Inc. and ATC Molding, LLC d/b/a LePark Mold & Tool |
| Ayro, Inc. |
| 3:2024cv00401 |
| May 20, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ATC Molding, LLC d/b/a LePark Mold & Tool, American Technology Components, Inc.. (Obert, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel R Obert on behalf of ATC Molding, LLC d/b/a LePark Mold & Tool, American Technology Components, Inc. (Obert, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Ayro, Inc.( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AINNDC-5578668.), filed by American Technology Components, Inc., ATC Molding, LLC d/b/a LePark Mold & Tool. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit 24, #25 Exhibit 25, #26 Civil Cover Sheet)(Obert, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
