Cobb v. Jayco, Inc.
| SHARON COBB |
| Jayco, Inc. |
| Gene Duffin |
| 3:2024cv00848 |
| October 16, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Scott J Frankel |
| Gretchen S Lund |
| Contract: Other |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
SCHEDULING ORDER: The parties are REMINDED of their obligation to comply with court-imposed deadlines and orders. The Court ADOPTS the parties' joint proposed report, in part, by reference. The parties will exchange the information required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) by 1/31/2025. The last date for the parties to amend the pleadings without leave of court is 3/3/2025. The serving of reports from retained experts under Rule 26(a)(2) are due from plaintiff(s) by 7/31/2025; and from defendant(s) by 9/1/2025. Supplementation under Rule 26(e) is due every six weeks until trial. The last date for the completion of ALL DISCOVERY is 3/31/2026. The deadline to file any discovery-related nondispositive motion is 3/3/2026. The deadline to file any dispositive motions is 4/30/2026. The parties have agreed to Gene Duffin as mediator. The parties are authorized to mediate until 4/14/2026. The Court hereby VACATES the Preliminary Pretrial Conference scheduled for December 19, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. EST. Signed by Magistrate Judge Scott J Frankel on 12/11/2024. (ash)
|
| Filing 13 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Foust Hunneshagen, Katlyn) |
| Filing 12 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties. (ers) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER: Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 12/19/2024 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Scott J Frankel. Joint Proposed Discovery due by 12/9/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Scott J Frankel on 11/18/2024. (ers)
|
| Filing 10 Jayco's ANSWER to #1 Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Jayco, Inc..(Foust Hunneshagen, Katlyn) |
| ***Corporate Disclosure Deadline terminated. (mlc) |
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Jayco, Inc.. (Foust Hunneshagen, Katlyn) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: Dft is ORDERED to file a fully compliant corporate disclosure statement on or before 11/8/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Scott J Frankel on 10/28/2024. (mrm)
|
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Jayco, Inc.. (Foust Hunneshagen, Katlyn) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Katlyn M Foust Hunneshagen on behalf of Jayco, Inc. (Foust Hunneshagen, Katlyn) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Civil Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet, Summons served on Patrick Jones, Authorized Agent on 10/22/2024, filed by Sharon Cobb., SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sharon Cobb. Jayco, Inc. served on 10/22/2024, answer due 11/12/2024. (Feinman, James) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Sharon Cobb. (Feinman, James) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by James B Feinman on behalf of Sharon Cobb (Feinman, James) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Jayco, Inc.. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (rmf) |
| *** NEW CASE *** Judge Gretchen S Lund and Magistrate Judge Scott J Frankel added. (rmf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Jayco, Inc.( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AINNDC-5714872.), filed by SHARON COBB. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Feinman, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
