Broxton v. Rensselaer City of
Plaintiff: James G Broxton
Defendant: Rensselaer City of
Case Number: 4:2008cv00028
Filed: April 25, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Jasper
Presiding Judge: Andrew P Rodovich
Presiding Judge: Allen Sharp
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 46 OPINION AND ORDER. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 27] is Granted in part and Denied in part. Summary Judgment is granted on the discriminatory discharge issue but is denied as to the racial harassment issue. Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 09/15/10. (csi)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Broxton v. Rensselaer City of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James G Broxton
Represented By: C Michael Riley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rensselaer City of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?