Pulous et al v. State of Indiana
| Donna Marie Pulous and Wayne Allen Fender |
| State of Indiana, Kurtis G Fouts, Abigail Diener, John JP Schafer, Analei Whitlock, Thomas Lock, Samantha Dagenais, Department of Child Services, Wabash Valley Alliance, Child & Family Partners, Christin Bramlage, Laurie Mailloux, Phillip Mailloux and Patrick Manahan |
| 4:2016cv00040 |
| May 13, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Lafayette Office |
| Tippecanoe |
| Paul R Cherry |
| Theresa L Springmann |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING the Motions for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Nos. 4-5); DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE the Amended Complaint (ECF No. 6) as to Defendants State of Indiana, Kurtis G. Fouts, Abigail Diener, Analei Whitlock, Samantha Dage nais, Christin Bramlage, Patrick Manahan, and the Department of Child Services; DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the Amended Complaint (ECF No. 6) as to Defendants John J.P. Schafer, Thomas Lock, Child and Family Partners, Laurie Mailloux, Phillip Maillou x, and Wabash Valley Alliance. The Plaintiffs are GRANTED until 11/30/2016 to file an amended complaint, accompanied by an Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (for each plaintiff) or the filing fee. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 10/31/16. (cc: Plaintiffs)(ksp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
