Lovato v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc
| Christella Lovato |
| Wal-Mart Stores Inc |
| 4:2016cv00084 |
| October 14, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Lafayette Office |
| Tippecanoe |
| Paul R Cherry |
| William C Lee |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
ORDER: The Court GRANTS in part as to Counts I and IV and DENIES in part as to Counts II and III regarding Walmart's Motion for Summary Judgment 55 . Walmart's Motion to Strike 65 is DENIED. Lovato's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment 63 is DENIED. Walmarts Motions for Leave to file its briefs partially redacted and under seal 54 and 66 are GRANTED. The Court will set a telephonic status conference with the parties in the coming weeks to discuss efforts to settle the case, select a trial date, as well as dates for the final pretrial conference and other trial-related deadlines. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 7/10/2019. (shk)
|
|
Filing
48
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 45 Defendant's Brief in Support of Petition for Award of Expenses Pursuant to Rule 37(a)(5)(C). Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 9/4/18. (ksp)
|
|
Filing
44
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendant's Motion to Compel 40 and ORDERS that Plaintiff's deposition shall take place, as outlined in Order. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff, on or before 8/6/2018, to provide at least 4 dates in September 2018 on which Plaintiff and her counsel are available for her deposition and to specify whether each date is proposed for an in-person deposition or a deposition by remote means. The Court EXTENDS the Fact Discover y Deadline to 10/5/2018. Any party wishing to pursue such an award in light of this Opinion and Order shall submit a brief in support on or before 8/9/2018. Response and reply deadlines shall follow those set forth in Northern District of Indiana Local Rule 7-1(d)(2). Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 7/26/2018. (lhc)
|
|
Filing
24
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court hereby GRANTS in part and DENIES without prejudice in part the Defendant's 21 Motion for Protective Order Regarding Plaintiff's Rule 30(B)(6) Deposition Notice. The Court ORDERS that Walmart's witnesses designated under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6) shall be deposed in Bentonville, Arkansas, at a date mutually agreeable to the parties. The court ORDERS Walmart, on or before 6/1/2017, to provide proposed deposition dates for the Rule 30(b)(6) depositions to Lovato. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 5/25/17. (jss)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lovato v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Christella Lovato | |
| Represented By: | Jason R Ramsland |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores Inc | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
