Solomon v. Wardlaw Claim Service, LLC

Plaintiff: Marlo Solomon
Defendant: Wardlaw Claim Service, LLC
Case Number: 4:2017cv00092
Filed: November 30, 2017
Court: Indiana Northern District Court
Office: Lafayette Office
County: Tippecanoe
Presiding Judge: James T Moody
Referring Judge: Andrew P Rodovich
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 18, 2018 38 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 30 MOTION to Withdraw 22 MOTION to Quash Non-Party Subpoena Duces Tecum filed by Indiana Department Workforce Development. The clerk is DIRECTED to show the non-party's Motion to Quash (DE 22) as WITHDRAWN. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 5/18/18. (ksp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Solomon v. Wardlaw Claim Service, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marlo Solomon
Represented By: Michael S Dalrymple
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wardlaw Claim Service, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?