Brown v. Stoneleigh Recovery Associates LLC
| CHAD Q. BROWN and Chad Q Brown |
| Stoneleigh Recovery Associates, LLC |
| 4:2018cv00054 |
| July 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Lafayette Office |
| Tippecanoe |
| James T Moody |
| Andrew P Rodovich |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS REISSUED as to Stoneleigh Recovery Associates, LLC with correct dft. NOTE: The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (sct) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Stoneleigh Recovery Associates, LLC. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (sct) |
| Senior Judge James T Moody and Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich added. (New Case) (sct) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Duran L Keller on behalf of Chad Q Brown (Keller, Duran) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Stoneleigh Recovery Associates, LLC( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-3635845.), filed by Chad Q Brown. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons to Stoneleigh Recovery Associates)(Keller, Duran) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
