Serault v. Subaru of Indiana Automotive Inc
Shelley D Serault |
Subaru of Indiana Automotive Inc |
4:2018cv00058 |
August 4, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Lafayette Office |
Tippecanoe |
John E Martin |
James T Moody |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties (Standard Track).. (smb) |
Filing 9 ORDER & NOTICE OF HEARING: Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 11/1/2018 10:15 AM Central in US District Court - Hammond before Magistrate Judge John E Martin. Propose joint discovery plan in accordance with FRCP 26 (f) due 10/26/2018. by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 9/28/2018. (smb) |
Filing 8 ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 9/28/2018. (smb) |
Filing 7 AGREED NOTICE to extend time to file answer filed by Subaru of Indiana Automotive Inc ; answer due by October 9, 2018. (Wilson, Heather) |
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Subaru of Indiana Automotive Inc identifying Corporate Parent Subaru Corporation for Subaru of Indiana Automotive Inc.. (Wilson, Heather) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Heather L Wilson on behalf of Subaru of Indiana Automotive Inc (Wilson, Heather) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer A Rulon on behalf of Subaru of Indiana Automotive Inc (Rulon, Jennifer) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Subaru of Indiana Automotive Inc. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (sct) |
Senior Judge James T Moody and Magistrate Judge John E Martin added. (New Case) (sct) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jay Meisenhelder on behalf of Shelley D Serault (Meisenhelder, Jay) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Demand for Jury Trial against Subaru of Indiana Automotive Inc( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-3641461.), filed by Shelly D Serault. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Meisenhelder, Jay) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Serault v. Subaru of Indiana Automotive Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Subaru of Indiana Automotive Inc | |
Represented By: | Jennifer A Rulon |
Represented By: | Heather L Wilson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Shelley D Serault | |
Represented By: | Jay Meisenhelder |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.