Kapers Building Materials, Inc. v. Boral Composites, Inc.
| Kapers Building Materials, Inc. and Kaper's Building Material, Inc. |
| Boral Composites, Inc. |
| 4:2018cv00096 |
| December 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Joseph S Van Bokkelen |
| John E Martin |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 ANSWER to Complaint by Boral Composites, Inc..(Mervilde, John) |
Filing 16
ORDER STRIKING 15 with leave to refile Answer to Complaint filed by Boral Composites, Inc. for failure to comply with Local Rule 10-1(a), requiring responsive pleadings under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7(a) to: (1) restate verbatim the paragraphs from the pleading they respond to; and (2) immediately following each restated paragraph, state the response to that paragraph. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 1/18/2019. (smb)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Boral Composites, Inc. answer due 1/16/2019. Approved by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 1/3/2019. No pdf attached (cp)
|
| Filing 13 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint by Defendant Boral Composites, Inc.. (Mervilde, John) |
| Filing 12 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties (Standard Track).. (smb) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER & NOTICE OF HEARING: Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 2/28/2019 11:00 AM Central in US District Court - Hammond before Magistrate Judge John E Martin. Proposed joint discovery plan in accordance with FRCP 26(f) due by 2/22/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 12/28/2018. (smb)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 12/28/2018. (smb)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Boral Composites, Inc. answer due 12/31/2018. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 12/7/2018. (smb)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE by Boral Composites, Inc. civil cover sheet (Mervilde, John) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Boral Composites, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, supplement of state court documents (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - summons, #3 Exhibit C - appearance)(Mervilde, John) |
| Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen and Magistrate Judge John E Martin added. (NEW CASE, MOTION PENDING)(Note: State Court Complaint or civil cover sheet not included with notice of removal) (rmc) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Boral Composites, Inc. of Compliance with Notice Requirement (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Mervilde, John) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Rick D Meils on behalf of All Defendants (Meils, Rick) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by John W Mervilde on behalf of All Defendants (Mervilde, John) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-3748033.) from Jasper County Circuit Court, Cause No. 37C01-1811-PL-001010, filed by Boral Composites, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B)(Mervilde, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
