Douglas et al v. Apex Parks Group, LLC
| Shaeley Cooper and Matthew Douglas |
| Apex Parks Group, LLC |
| 4:2019cv00076 |
| August 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| John E Martin |
| Theresa L Springmann |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Frost, Thel) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE by Apex Parks Group, LLC re #13 Memorandum in Support, #12 MOTION for Summary Judgment Designation of Evidence (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Affidvit of Scott Bishop, #2 Exhibit B-Autopsy/Toxicology Rec)(Hearn, Edward) |
| Filing 13 MEMORANDUM in Support of #12 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Apex Parks Group, LLC. (Hearn, Edward) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendant Apex Parks Group, LLC. (Hearn, Edward) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint by Apex Parks Group, LLC.(Hearn, Edward) |
| Filing 10 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties.. (smb) |
Filing 9
ORDER & NOTICE OF HEARING: Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 10/17/2019 10:30 AM Central in US District Court - Hammond before Magistrate Judge John E Martin. Proposed joint discovery plan in accordance with FRCP 26(f) due 10/11/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 9/10/2019. (smb)
|
| Filing 8 REDACTION to #1 Notice of Removal, by Apex Parks Group, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Redacted Complaint, #2 Exhibit Redacted Affidavit)(Hearn, Edward) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER : The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to RESTRICT to the parties and court users the following docket entries in this matter #4 and #1 . The Court ORDERS the parties to file redacted versions of the two documents by 8/28/2019. The Court further ORDERS counsel to file only documents that comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2 and ADVISES counsel that future filings that contain any minor's full name will be stricken. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 8/21/2019.
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 8/20/2019. (smb)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Bradford James Smith on behalf of Shaeley Cooper, Matthew Douglas (Smith, Bradford) |
| Chief Judge Theresa L Springmann and Magistrate Judge John E Martin added. NEW CASE (kjp) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Thel Matthew Frost on behalf of All Defendants (Frost, Thel) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Edward W Hearn on behalf of All Defendants (Hearn, Edward) |
| Filing 1 RESTRICTED per #7 ORDER NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Defendants) (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-3976800.) from White Superior Court, Cause No. 91D01-1907-CT-000014, filed by Apex Parks Group, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Hearn, Edward) Modified on 8/22/2019 (jss). |
| Filing 4 RESTRICTED per #7 ORDER STATE COURT COMPLAINT with jury demand against Apex Parks Group, LLC, filed by Matthew Douglas, Shaeley Cooper.(kjp) Modified on 8/22/2019 (jss). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
