Sausa v Commissioner of Social Security
| KATEY L. SAUSA and Katey L Sausa |
| ANDREW M. SAUL and Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA (Court Use Only) |
| 4:2020cv00030 |
| May 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| William C Lee |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Katey L Sausa. Commissioner of Social Security (AUSA) served on 5/15/2020, answer due 7/16/2020. (Wold, Kirsten) Modified on 6/17/2020 to correct date served (lhc). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Kathleen T Trzyna - AUSA on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Trzyna - AUSA, Kathleen) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. NOTE: The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. (nal) |
| Judge William C Lee added. NEW CASE. (nal) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Kirsten E Wold on behalf of KATEY L. SAUSA (Wold, Kirsten) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANDREW M. SAUL( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-4218172.), filed by KATEY L. SAUSA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons)(Wold, Kirsten) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
