Perdue v. Menards, Inc. et al
| Tessa Perdue |
| Menards, Inc. and The Trademark Exteriors, LLC |
| 4:2020cv00077 |
| October 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| John E Martin |
| Philip P Simon |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Change of Address/Contact Information (Hearn, Edward) ***FILING ERROR; ATTORNEY TO FILE IN INSD*** Modified on 11/23/2020 (ace). |
Filing 14
ORDER ON JOINT MOTION TO REMAND, GRANTING #13 Joint MOTION to Remand to State Court by Cross Claimant Menards, Inc., Defendant Menards, Inc. This matter is hereby remanded to the Tippecanoe County Circuit Court, cause number 79C01-2005-CT-000099. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 10/21/2020. (Copy mailed to Tippecanoe County Circuit Court) (lhc) Modified on 10/21/2020 cc Trademark Ext (lhc).
|
| Filing 13 Joint MOTION to Remand to State Court by Cross Claimant Menards, Inc., Defendant Menards, Inc.. (Loftus, Barry) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 10/19/2020. (smb)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER: The Court docket is not clear as to whether Defendant Trademark Exteriors LLC has been served with Summons and Complaint in this cause of action. Accordingly, the Plaintiff is ORDERED to file proof of service of the Complaint on or before 11/2/2020. Alternatively, Plaintiff may file their proposed Summons on the Court docket for the Clerk to issue. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 10/19/2020. (smb)
|
| Filing 10 SUPPLEMENT JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT OF DEFENDANT MENARD, INC. filed by Menards, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Correspondence)(Loftus, Barry) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint , CROSSCLAIM against The Trademark Exteriors, LLC by Menards, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Loftus, Barry) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: Defendant Menard, Inc. is ORDERED to FILE, on or before 10/19/2020, a supplemental jurisdictional statement demonstrating (1) the citizenships of Plaintiff and Defendant Trademark and (2) that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.00 as outlined above. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 10/7/2020. (mrm)
|
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice to State Court Clerk and Notice of Removal)(Loftus, Barry) |
| Judge Philip P Simon and Magistrate Judge John E Martin added. (NEW CASE) (bas) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Lauren Ashley Binger on behalf of Menards, Inc. (Binger, Lauren) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by David Matthew Stupich on behalf of Menards, Inc. (Stupich, David) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Menards, Inc.. (Loftus, Barry) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Barry L Loftus on behalf of Menards, Inc. (Loftus, Barry) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-4361288.) from Tippecanoe Circuit Court, Cause No. 79C01-2005-CT-000099, filed by Menards, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Complaint & Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Loftus, Barry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
