Stump v. Franciscan Alliance, Inc
Bret Stump |
Franciscan Alliance, Inc |
4:2021cv00037 |
June 4, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
John E Martin |
James T Moody |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Support of #10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Franciscan Alliance, Inc. (Adolay, Amy) |
Filing 10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Franciscan Alliance, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice of Right to Sue)(Adolay, Amy) |
Filing 9 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties.. (smb) |
Filing 8 ORDER & NOTICE OF HEARING: Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 8/26/2021 12:00 PM Central before Magistrate Judge John E Martin. Proposed joint discovery plan in accordance with FRCP (f) by 8/20/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 7/27/2021. (smb) |
Filing 7 ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 7/27/2021. (smb) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer due 7/28/21 per Agreed Notice #6 . (jld) |
Filing 6 AGREED NOTICE to extend time to file answer filed by Franciscan Alliance, Inc ; answer due by 7/28/2021. (Adolay, Amy) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Amy J Adolay on behalf of Franciscan Alliance, Inc (Adolay, Amy) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth M Roberson on behalf of Franciscan Alliance, Inc (Roberson, Elizabeth) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Franciscan Alliance, Inc. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (shk) |
**NEW CASE** Senior Judge James T Moody and Magistrate Judge John E Martin added. (shk) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason R Ramsland on behalf of Bret Stump (Ramsland, Jason) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Franciscan Alliance, Inc( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0755-4593538.), filed by Bret Stump. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Ramsland, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Stump v. Franciscan Alliance, Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Franciscan Alliance, Inc | |
Represented By: | Amy J Adolay |
Represented By: | Elizabeth M Roberson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Bret Stump | |
Represented By: | Jason R Ramsland |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.