Wabash National Corporation v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London
Plaintiff: Wabash National Corporation
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London
Case Number: 4:2022cv00023
Filed: March 14, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Joshua P Kolar
Referring Judge: James T Moody
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 9, 2022 Filing 8 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties. (tc)
May 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 5/26/2022 10:30 AM (Central time) before Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar. Parties are instructed to dial 877-336-1280 and enter access code 3293676# when prompted to join the conference. A proposed Discovery Plan under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) to be filed no later than five (5) business days prior to the pretrial conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 5/9/2022. (tc)
May 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 5/6/2022. (tc)
May 5, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Meghan C Dalton on behalf of Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London (Dalton, Meghan)
May 5, 2022 Filing 4 DISCLOSURE of DEFENDANTS RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London.(Dalton, Meghan)
May 5, 2022 Filing 3 DEFENDANTS ANSWER to #1 Complaint, AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London.(Dalton, Meghan)
March 15, 2022 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (mlc)
March 15, 2022 **NEW CASE** Senior Judge James T Moody and Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar added. (mlc)
March 14, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT against Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AINNDC-4857587.), filed by Wabash National Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Policy, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons Summons - Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London)(Delehanty, Joseph)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wabash National Corporation v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wabash National Corporation
Represented By: Joseph R Delehanty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London
Represented By: Meghan C Dalton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?