Barbour et al v. Minnesota Life Insurance Company
| Thomas Barbour and Jennifer Barbour |
| Minnesota Life Insurance Company |
| 4:2022cv00039 |
| June 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Andrew P Rodovich |
| Theresa L Springmann |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to the #12 Notice of Settlement, parties are DIRECTED to file dismissal papers by 8/24/2022. The Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 7/22/2022 before Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich is VACATED. (tc) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Settlement by Minnesota Life Insurance Company (Mathisen, Eric) |
| Filing 11 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Olds, James) |
| ***Answer Deadline for Minnesota Life Insurance Company terminated. Answer was filed at DE #10 . (asd) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint by Minnesota Life Insurance Company.(Mathisen, Eric) |
| Filing 9 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties. (tc) |
Filing 8
ORDER AND NOTICE OF HEARING: Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 7/22/2022 10:00 AM (Central time) before Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich. Court to initiate the call. The attorneys shall provide a direct dial number to Judge Rodovich's Case Manager at teresa_castillo@innd.uscourts.gov at least 24 hours prior to the conference. The direct dial number must bypass any receptionist or automated answering system. A proposed Discovery Plan under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) to be filed no later than five (5) business days prior to the pretrial conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 6/29/2022. (tc)
|
| Set Deadlines per #6 Agreed Notice. Defendant Minnesota Life Insurance Company answer due by 07/06/2022. (sej) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by James F Olds on behalf of Jennifer Barbour, Thomas Barbour (Olds, James) |
| Filing 6 AGREED NOTICE to extend time to file answer filed by Minnesota Life Insurance Company ; answer due by July 6, 2022. (Mathisen, Eric) |
|
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 6/3/2022. (tc)
|
| **NEW CASE** Judge Theresa L Springmann and Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich added. (shk) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Minnesota Life Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Securian Holding Company, Corporate Parent Securian Financial Group Inc, Corporate Parent Minnesota Mutual Companies Inc for Minnesota Life Insurance Company.. (Mathisen, Eric) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric P Mathisen on behalf of Minnesota Life Insurance Company (Mathisen, Eric) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AINNDC-4933702.) from Tippecanoe Circuit Court, Cause No. 79C01-2205-PL-000041, filed by Minnesota Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, state court record, #2 Exhibit B, Notice of Filing Notice of Removal to be filed in state court action, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mathisen, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
