Fisher v. Rossi et al
Plaintiff: Francis Edward Fisher
Defendant: David Rossi and John Guy
Case Number: 4:2022cv00061
Filed: September 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Joseph S Van Bokkelen
Referring Judge: John E Martin
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 REPLY to Response to Motion re #12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by David Rossi. (Wheaton, Elizabeth)
October 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER: The Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff an extension of time to have summons issued and served on Defendant John Guy, ORDERS Plaintiffs to provide proposed summons and file proof of service with the Clerk's Office, on or before 11/28/2022, or face dismissal of his case. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 10/27/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (jdb)
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ADDENDUM to #14 Reply to Order dated 9/29/22 filed by Francis Edward Fisher. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mlc)
October 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties.. Magistrate Consent forms due by 11/3/2022. (copy to pro se party)(smb)
October 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 REPLY to Order dated 9/29/22 by Francis Edward Fisher re #11 Order,, Set Deadlines,. (mlc)
October 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM in Support of #12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by David Rossi. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Criminal Docket)(Wheaton, Elizabeth)
October 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant David Rossi. (Wheaton, Elizabeth)
September 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: The Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiff Francis Edward Fisher to file with the Court proof of service of the Complaint on Defendant John Guy, or to provide proposed summons for John Guy to the Clerks Office and serve that summons and the Complaint on John Guy in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on or before 10/31/2022, or face dismissal of Defendant Guy from his case. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 09/29/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (jdb)
September 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 9/28/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(smb)
September 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SUMMARY OF CLAIM per F.R.C.F. 8 filed by plaintiff Francis Edward Fisher. (mlc)
September 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: The Court DENIES Defendant Rossi's #5 Motion for Screening Order. Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 9/8/22. (Copy mailed to pro se party). (nal)
September 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: The Court hereby GRANTS the Motion for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading #6 and ORDERS that Defendants shall have an extensionfor thirty days after entry of an order ruling on their motion for screening at DE #5 to respond to the Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 09/07/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(sej)
September 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant David Rossi. (Wheaton, Elizabeth)
September 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION Screening Order by Defendant David Rossi. (Wheaton, Elizabeth)
September 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen and Magistrate Judge John E Martin added. **NEW CASE** (sej)
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew S Clark on behalf of David Rossi (Clark, Matthew)
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth M Wheaton on behalf of David Rossi (Wheaton, Elizabeth)
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AINNDC-5013174.) from White County Circuit Court, Cause No. 91C01-2208-PL-000022, filed by David Rossi. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Record, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wheaton, Elizabeth)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fisher v. Rossi et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Francis Edward Fisher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Rossi
Represented By: Matthew S Clark
Represented By: Elizabeth M Wheaton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Guy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?