Conner v. Sheriff of Warren County Indiana
| Gary M Conner and Gary Michael Conner |
| Sheriff of Warren County Indiana and Sheriff |
| 4:2022cv00084 |
| October 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| John E Martin |
| Theresa L Springmann |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Mail Returned from Gary M Conner as Undeliverable - Return to Sender - NO LONGER HERE re: #2 Opinion and Order, #3 Clerks Judgment. (jdb) Modified on 11/16/2022 to add docket text (nae).
|
|
Filing 3
CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (copy mailed to pro se party). (shk)
|
|
Filing 2
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court DISMISSES without prejudice the petition #1 pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases because the claims are unexhausted; DENIES Gary M. Conner a certificate of appealability pursuant to Section 2254 Habeas Corpus Rule 11; and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to close this case. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 10/28/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(shk)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Gary Conner. (no ifp form filed or fee paid, file marked copy returned to Conner) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mlc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/25/2022: #2 Letter) (mlc).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
