Doyle v. Indiana Packers et al
Brandon C Doyle |
Indiana Packers, Ruben Hernandez, JC Pratter and William Delp |
4:2022cv00099 |
December 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
John E Martin |
Philip P Simon |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (Copy mailed to pro se party via cert # 7020 0640 0000 2334 9945) (ash) |
Filing 4 ORDER: In view of Brandon C. Doyle's failure to timely comply with the order of12/28/2022 #3 by paying the filing fee and submitting a proposed amendedcomplaint, the Clerk shall CLOSE this matter. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 2/6/2023. (Copy mailed to pro se party via cert # 7020 0640 0000 2334 9945)(ash) |
Filing 3 OPINION AND ORDER: Brandon C. Doyle's #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is DENIED and the complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C.1915(e)(2)(B). Doyle is granted until 1/31/23 to pay the $402.00 filing fee and submit a proposed first amended complaint over which federal subject matter jurisdiction exists. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 12/28/22. (Copy mailed to pro se party). (nal) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Brandon C Doyle. (mlc) |
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against William Delp, Ruben Hernandez, Indiana Packers, JC Pratter, filed by Brandon C Doyle.(mlc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.