Mapes v. Rush
Eric-Joshua Mapes |
Loretta H Rush |
4:2023cv00017 |
February 17, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
John E Martin |
Philip P Simon |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 Circuit Rule 3(b) Fee Notice as to #9 Notice of Appeal filed by Eric-Joshua Mapes (mlc) |
Filing 14 ORDER: The motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis #10 is DENIED. Additionally, the motion for appointment of counsel #11 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 3/27/2023. (Copy mailed to pro se party). (nhc) |
Filing 13 USCA Case Number 23-1560 for #9 Notice of Appeal filed by Eric-Joshua Mapes. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Case Opening)(mlc) |
Filing 12 Short Record Sent to US Court of Appeals re #9 Notice of Appeal. No appeal fees paid. (nhc) |
Filing 11 Appellant's/Petioner's Motion Request for Appointment of Counsel as a "Reasonable Disability Accommodation" by Plaintiff Eric-Joshua Mapes. (nhc) |
Filing 10 Verified Affidavit to Proceed on Appeal in Forma Pauperis by Plaintiff Eric-Joshua Mapes. (nhc) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #8 Order on Motion for Reconsideration by Eric-Joshua Mapes. (Attachment: #1 Envelope).(nhc) |
Filing 8 ORDER DENYING #6 MOTION for Reconsideration filed by Eric-Joshua Mapes. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 3/16/23. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ksp) |
Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT Jurat filed by Eric-Joshua Mapes. (Attachment: #1 Envelope). (nal) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Reconsider by Plaintiff Eric-Joshua Mapes. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support, #2 Envelope). (nal) |
Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed as to #3 Opinion and Order, #4 Clerks Judgment. (jdb) |
Filing 4 CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (Copy mailed to pro se party, certified #7099 3400 0003 4511 1874) (shk) Modified to add certified routing info on 2/28/2023 (nhc). |
Filing 3 OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #2 is DENIED and the complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii), and (iii). Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 2/27/2023. (Copy mailed to pro se party, certified mail #7099 3400 0003 4511 1874)(shk) Modified to add certified routing info on 2/28/2023 (nhc). |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Eric-Joshua Mapes. (rmf) |
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Loretta H Rush, filed by Eric-Joshua Mapes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(rmf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/17/2023: #3 Exhibit) (rmf). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Mapes v. Rush | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Eric-Joshua Mapes | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Loretta H Rush | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.