Anders v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Laura A Anders |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| General Counsel SSA (Court use only) |
| 4:2023cv00055 |
| July 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Andrew P Rodovich |
| Theresa L Springmann |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (mrm) |
Filing 11
ORDER: The Court hereby GRANTS the Agreed Motion to Remand #10 , REVERSES the decision of the Commissioner, and REMANDS this matter under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for further administrative proceedings. Upon remand, theALJ will consider the evidence, including the medical evidence and medical opinions, offer the Plaintiff the opportunity for a new hearing, and issue a new decision. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 8/25/2023. (mrm)
|
| Filing 10 Joint MOTION to Remand by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Brechtelsbauer, Erin) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3, the claimant/plaintiff is directed to file his/her opening brief by the deadline set out below. Failure to do so could result in dismissal of this case pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Briefs under this rule are subject to the page limitations in Local Rule 7-1(e). The Social Security Brief of the Plaintiff is due by 10/4/2023. The Social Security Response Brief of the Government is due by 11/15/2023. The Social Security Reply Brief of the Plaintiff is due by 11/29/2023. By Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 8/24/2023. Text entry only. (tc)
|
| Filing 8 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS IN A SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL CASE sent to all parties. Magistrate Consent forms due by 9/7/2023. (tc) |
| Filing 7 SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD by Commissioner of Social Security. (Brechtelsbauer, Erin) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Erin L Brechtelsbauer on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Brechtelsbauer, Erin) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Commencement of Social Security Appeal action #1 Complaint sent to the Commissioner of Social Security. Commissioner of Social Security Answer or Motion due 9/11/2023. Pursuant to General Order #2022-20, the briefing schedule is as follows: The plaintiff's opening brief must be filed within 42 days after the answer is filed or 42 days after entry of an order disposing of the last remaining motion under Rule 4(c) of the Supplemental Rules, whichever is later. The Commissioner's response brief must be filed 42 days after service of the opening brief. Any reply brief must be filed 14 days after service of the response brief. (nal) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The court WAIVES payment of the filing fee and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to docket a Notice of Commencement of Social Security Appeal Action. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 7/10/23. (nal)
|
| **NEW CASE, PENDING MOTION** Judge Theresa L Springmann and Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich added. (sej) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Laura A Anders. (Marvin, Cody) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Cody T Marvin on behalf of Laura A Anders (Marvin, Cody) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Laura A Anders. (Attachments: #1 AC decision, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Marvin, Cody) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
