Browne v. Equifax Information Services LLC
| Erin Browne |
| Equifax Information Services LLC |
| 4:2023cv00064 |
| July 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Joshua P Kolar |
| Theresa L Springmann |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER: Finding good cause shown and noting the parties' agreement, the Court GRANTS #17 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Continue Rule 16 Conference. The 10/20/2022 deadline to file a discovery plan is VACATED. The Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary set for 9/28/2023 is RESET to 11/21/2023 at 10:30 AM (Central time) before Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar. Parties are instructed to dial 833-568-8864, enter Meeting ID 161 2255 6691 and passcode 252788 when prompted to join the conference. Parties are reminded of their obligation to submit a proposed Discovery Plan under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) no later than five (5) business days prior to the pretrial conference. Approved by Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 9/22/2023. Text entry order. (tc)
|
| Filing 17 MOTION to Continue Rule 16 Conference (unopposed) by Plaintiff Erin Browne. (Keller, Duran) |
| Filing 16 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Keller, Duran) |
| Filing 15 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties. (tc) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER: Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 9/28/2023 10:30 AM (Central time) before Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar. Parties are instructed to dial 833-568-8864, enter Meeting ID 161 2255 6691 and passcode 252788 to join the conference. A proposed Discovery Plan under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) to be filed no later than five (5) business days prior to the pretrial conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 9/6/2023. (tc)
|
| Filing 13 ANSWER to #10 Amended Complaint by Equifax Information Services LLC.(Cangany, Warren) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER: In light of #10 Amended Complaint, and 11 Order denying the motion to dismiss as moot, the Court DENIES AS MOOT #8 Defendant's Motion to Stay Discovery. Defendant may file a renewed motion to stay discovery upon any filing of a motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint. Approved by Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 8/23/2023. Text entry order. (tc)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER FOR JUDGE THERESA L SPRINGMANN: In light of the filing of the Amended Complaint #10 , the Court DENIES AS MOOT the #6 Motion to Dismiss (jss)
|
| Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Equifax Information Services LLC, filed by Erin Browne.(Keller, Duran) |
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM in Support of #8 MOTION to Stay Discovery filed by Equifax Information Services LLC. (Cangany, Warren) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Stay Discovery by Defendant Equifax Information Services LLC. (Cangany, Warren) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support of #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Motion to Dismiss or Alternative Motion for More Definite Statement filed by Equifax Information Services LLC. (Cangany, Warren) |
| Filing 6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Motion to Dismiss or Alternative Motion for More Definite Statement by Defendant Equifax Information Services LLC. (Cangany, Warren) |
|
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 7/27/2023. (tc)
|
| **NEW CASE** Judge Theresa L Springmann and Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar added. (kmt) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Equifax Information Services LLC identifying Corporate Parent Equifax Inc for Equifax Information Services LLC.. (Cangany, Warren) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Warren F Cangany on behalf of Equifax Information Services LLC (Cangany, Warren) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AINNDC-5308436.) from Circuit Court of Tippecanoe County, Cause No. 79C01-2304-CT-000082, filed by Equifax Information Services LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Filing Removal to Federal Court, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cangany, Warren) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Browne v. Equifax Information Services LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Erin Browne | |
| Represented By: | Duran L Keller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Equifax Information Services LLC | |
| Represented By: | Warren F Cangany |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
