Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. v. Link Transport, Inc. et al
RYDER INTEGRATED LOGISTICS, INC. and Ryder Integrated Logistics Inc |
LINK TRANSPORT, INC., MATTHEW OSSOWSKI, Link Transport Inc and Matthew D Ossowski |
4:2023cv00091 |
November 8, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Joshua P Kolar |
Theresa L Springmann |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Link Transport Inc, Matthew D Ossowski. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (Attachments: #1 Ossowski Issued Summons)(nae) |
**NEW CASE** Judge Theresa L Springmann and Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar added. (nae) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Edward C Harcourt on behalf of RYDER INTEGRATED LOGISTICS, INC. (Harcourt, Edward) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AINNDC-5407463.), filed by RYDER INTEGRATED LOGISTICS, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Link Contract, #2 Exhibit Subaru Contract, #3 Exhibit Addendum A, #4 Civil Cover Sheet civil cover sheet, #5 Proposed Summons summons, #6 Proposed Summons summons)(Harcourt, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.