Luckett v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: DEXTER LUCKETT
Defendant: Commissioner of SSA Martin J O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security and General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Case Number: 4:2024cv00004
Filed: January 15, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Joseph S Van Bokkelen
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 17, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Elisa Donohoe on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Donohoe, Elisa)
January 16, 2024 Filing 5 Notice of Commencement of Social Security Appeal action ( #1 Complaint) sent to the Commissioner of Social Security. Commissioner of Social Security Answer or Motion due 3/18/2024. Pursuant to General Order #2022-20, the briefing schedule is as follows: The plaintiff's opening brief must be filed within 42 days after the answer is filed or 42 days after entry of an order disposing of the last remaining motion under Rule 4(c) of the Supplemental Rules, whichever is later. The Commissioner's response brief must be filed 42 days after service of the opening brief. Any reply brief must be filed 14 days after service of the response brief. (nhc)
January 16, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; WAIVES payment of the filing fee; and DIRECTS the clerk to docket a Notice of Commencement of Social Security Appeal Action. Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 1/16/24. (nhc)
January 16, 2024 **NEW CASE** **IFP MOTION PENDING** Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen added. (rmf)
January 15, 2024 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff DEXTER LUCKETT. (Wold, Kirsten)
January 15, 2024 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Kirsten E Wold on behalf of DEXTER LUCKETT (Wold, Kirsten)
January 15, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Martin J O'Malley, filed by DEXTER LUCKETT. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons)(Wold, Kirsten)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Luckett v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DEXTER LUCKETT
Represented By: Kirsten E Wold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of SSA Martin J O'Malley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Elisa Donohoe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?