Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund v. Camaco Inc.
| Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund |
| CAMACO INC. |
| 4:2024cv00026 |
| March 29, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Andrew P Rodovich |
| Philip P Simon |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER: Within thirty (30) days of this order, Plaintiff must file an appropriate motion for default judgment, supported by all necessary affidavits and other documentation and accompanied by a proposed default judgment.Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 5/2/2024. (Copy mailed as directed in Order)(rs)
|
| Filing 7 CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT against *Camaco Inc.* regarding #6 Application for Clerk's Entry of Default filed by Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund (nae) |
| Filing 6 APPLICATION FOR CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT by Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund as to Camaco, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of RJM)(Lehman, Sawyer) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund. Camaco Inc. served on 4/6/2024, answer due 4/29/2024. (McColm, Rebecca) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Camaco Inc.. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (shk) |
| **NEW CASE** Judge Philip P Simon and Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich added. (shk) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul E Stoehr on behalf of Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund (Stoehr, Paul) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Rebecca J McColm on behalf of Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund (McColm, Rebecca) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CAMACO INC.( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AINNDC-5531874.), filed by Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - CBA, #2 Exhibit B - Signature Page, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Proposed Summons)(McColm, Rebecca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund v. Camaco Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund | |
| Represented By: | Paul E Stoehr |
| Represented By: | Rebecca J McColm |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CAMACO INC. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
