DAVIS et al v. CARMEL CLAY SCHOOLS
| SHERONDA DAVIS and RICKEY L. DAVIS |
| CARMEL CLAY SCHOOLS |
| 1:2011cv00771 |
| June 7, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
209
ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS - Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand is DENIED; Plaintiffs' Motion for Final Judgment as to the federal claims is GRANTED; and Defendant's Motion to Limit Testimony is DENIED AS MOOT. The case shall proceed accordingly. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 11/25/2013. (CKM)
|
|
Filing
201
ORDER denying 125 Plaintiffs' Motion for Sanctions Regarding Spoliation of Evidence and granting 132 Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs' federal claims are dismissed. The Court will exercise its supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs' remaining claims brought under Indiana law, and the case will proceed accordingly. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 9/30/2013. (PGS)
|
|
Filing
194
ORDER denying Pltf's 179 Motion for Sanctions (see Order). Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 9/10/2013. (SWM)
|
|
Filing
188
ORDER granting Deft's 170 Motion to Quash (see Order). Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 5/17/2013. (SWM)
|
|
Filing
115
ORDER granting in part and denying in part the Prosecutor's 90 Motion for Reconsideration (see Order for details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 10/11/2012. (SWM)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER denying Deft's 41 Motion for Protective Order (see Order). Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 4/9/2012. (SWM)
|
|
Filing
77
DISCOVERY ORDER: The motion to quash 22 is DENIED and the motion to compel 68 is GRANTED with respect to the remaining documents on the Prosecutor's privilege log, as well as any other documents or other materials responsive to Plaintiffs' subpoena that have been omitted from the privilege log. The Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel is GRANTED with respect to all evidence reque sted in its subpoena duces tecum served on the City, with the exception of the documents discussed and specified above. The City shall file an am ended privilege log under seal within seven days of this order listing these documents and designate, by initials, which indivi dual (s) the document references so that the Court can make a determination as to which, if any, of these documents are confidential and exempt from disclosu re. In order to protect the identity of the minor witnesses, the parties shall move the Court for entry of a protective order with the Prosecutor and the City within seven days of the date of this Order (see Order for additional information). Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 3/30/2012. (SWM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
