Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Carmel Clay Schools v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv03147
Defendant:
James Monsees, JUUL Labs, Inc. f/k/a PAX Labs, Inc., Hoyoung Huh and others
Plaintiff:
Carmel Clay Schools
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00320
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00003
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
MCCALLEY et al v. CARMEL CLAY SCHOOL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018cv03368
Defendant:
TOBY STEELE, CARMEL CLAY SCHOOL CORPORATION, CARMEL HIGH SCHOOL and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MCCALLEY, MARILYN MCCALLEY and PATRICK MCCALLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01955
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
VOICES UNITED v. CARMEL CLAY SCHOOLS et al
as 1:2017cv00693
Defendant:
CARMEL CLAY SCHOOLS and PRINCIPAL, CARMEL HIGH SCHOOL
Plaintiff:
VOICES UNITED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00566
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act - Enforcement
SONNIER v. MAGIC CIRCLE CORPORATION et al
as 1:2014mc00092
Defendant:
BEMIS MANUFACTURING COMPANY, GENERAC POWER SYSTEMS INCORPORATED, KELCH CORPORATION and others
Interested Party:
CARMEL CLAY SCHOOL CORPORATION and KINSEY WALLACE
Plaintiff:
MARY LORENA SONNIER
Rickey Davis, et al v. Carmel Clay School
as 13-3701
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKEY L. DAVIS and SHERONDA DAVIS, next best friends of M.D.
Defendant - Appellee:
CARMEL CLAY SCHOOLS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
