STRINGHAM v. CARMEL CLAY SCHOOLS et al
| DIANNA STRINGHAM |
| CARMEL CLAY SCHOOLS and BOARD OF SCHOOL TRUSTEES OF CARMEL CLAY SCHOOLS |
| 1:2022cv00817 |
| April 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mario Garcia |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to 07/01/2022 to File Agency Record (Unopposed), filed by Plaintiff DIANNA STRINGHAM. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Email, #2 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motion)(Maddox, Jamie) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint , filed by All Defendants.(Borg, Brent) |
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING #10 PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE AGENCY RECORD - This matter came before the Court upon the Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Agency Record, and the Court, having considered the same and being duly advised, hereby finds that the Unopposed Motion should be GRANTED in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND DECREED that the deadline for Mrs. Stringham to file the agency record is enlarged twenty-eight (28) days from May 27, 2022, to June 24, 2022. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/23/2022. (AKH)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Jessica Williams Schnelker on behalf of Defendants BOARD OF SCHOOL TRUSTEES OF CARMEL CLAY SCHOOLS, CARMEL CLAY SCHOOLS. (Schnelker, Jessica) |
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to 06/24/22 to File Agency Record, filed by Plaintiff DIANNA STRINGHAM. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Email and Letter, #2 Exhibit 2 - Email, #3 Text of Proposed Order Granting Unopposed Motion)(Maddox, Jamie) |
|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER-TELEPHONIC Initial Pretrial Conference set for 7/6/2022 at 10:30 AM (Eastern) before Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia. The information needed to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by a separate notification. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 5/4/2022.(CBU)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendants BOARD OF SCHOOL TRUSTEES OF CARMEL CLAY SCHOOLS, CARMEL CLAY SCHOOLS. (Borg, Brent) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Brent R. Borg on behalf of Defendants BOARD OF SCHOOL TRUSTEES OF CARMEL CLAY SCHOOLS, CARMEL CLAY SCHOOLS. (Borg, Brent) |
| Filing 6 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to BOARD OF SCHOOL TRUSTEES OF CARMEL CLAY SCHOOLS, and CARMEL CLAY SCHOOLS. (DJH) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Chad Harrison Holler on behalf of Plaintiff DIANNA STRINGHAM. (Holler, Chad) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Sandra L. Blevins on behalf of Plaintiff DIANNA STRINGHAM. (Blevins, Sandra) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jamie A. Maddox on behalf of Plaintiff DIANNA STRINGHAM. (Maddox, Jamie) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages and Demand for Trial By Jury against BOARD OF SCHOOL TRUSTEES OF CARMEL CLAY SCHOOLS, CARMEL CLAY SCHOOLS, filed by DIANNA STRINGHAM. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7078496) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Findings of Fact, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons for Carmel Clay Schools and Board of Trustees of Carmel Clay Schools)(Maddox, Jamie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
