SMITH v. CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES
| KEVIN SMITH |
| BRIAN SMITH, KAYLA MCDERMITT, LETIA LEWIS, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, DANIELS, CORK, CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, RICHARD TANNER and THOMPSON |
| 1:2014cv00094 |
| January 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Mark J. Dinsmore |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ENTRY - The claim against the Indiana Department of Correction is dismissed. The claim against Superintendent Brian Smith is dismissed. Mr. Smith's claim of "discrimination" is dismissed. Mr. Smith's state law claim of defamat ion of character is dismissed. Any claims based on the Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments are dismissed. The claims against these three defendants, Sgt. Cork, Sgt. Daniels, and Lt. Thompson, shall also proceed. These defendants continue to h ave through February 28, 2014 by which to respond to Mr. Smith's Complaint. Defendants Kayla McDermitt and LeTia Lewis have not appeared in this action. Mr. Smith shall have through February 28, 2014 to demonstrate that he has perfected service of process on these defendants. Copy Mailed. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/3/2014. (MGG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
