Cases 1 - 10 of 670
Smith v. Boise Cascade Co et al
as 2:2024cv01356
Defendant:
Corvel Corp and Boise Cascade Co
Plaintiff:
Brian Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BARKER v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2024cv00462
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, BRIAN SMITH, BOBBY-JOE and others
Plaintiff:
KENTE BARKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Tuskee Airmen National Historical Museum et al
as 2:2024cv12290
Defendant:
Brian Smith and TUSKEE AIRMEN NATIONAL HISTORICAL MUSEUM
Plaintiff:
SHAMALIA WILLIS
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Michael Brian Smith v. Epson America Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv07270
Defendant:
Does 1-20 inclusive and Epson America Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Brian Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jennewein et al v. Allied Waterproofing Co., Inc.
as 4:2024cv01119
Plaintiff:
Michael Fox, Tim Kaikkonen, John J. Smith, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Allied Waterproofing Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Smith v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 2:2024cv03762
Plaintiff:
Brian Smith
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as PAE/2:24-cv-03762
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Plaintiff:
Brian Smith
Smith et al v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv01933
Plaintiff:
Brian Smith and Smith Ventures, Ltd.
Defendant:
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
United States of America v. Boykin (Jacklyn)
as 24-1817
Defendant:
SEAN COTTON, ANTHONY BOYKIN, RAHSAAN MELVIN and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02430
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Brian Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
