PETERSON v. DIETER et al
| LAWRENCE PETERSON |
| DIETER, GRAY, CHRIS MORRISON, BECCA REMILLARD, SANDMAN and SECURITY STAFF |
| 1:2014cv00923 |
| June 5, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Denise K. LaRue |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
Entry Granting Motion for Summary Judgment - The Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, (Dkt. 27) and this action must be dismissed without prejudice. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. (See Order). Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/8/2016. (JLS) Modified on 2/8/2016 (JLS).
|
|
Filing
11
SCREENING ENTRY TO CORRECT CAPTION AND PROCESS SERVICE - The Court does not view "Security Staff" as a separate defendant and that designation shall be terminated as a defendant. The clerk shall also show No. 1:14-cv-0725-SEB-MJD to be a related case to this case. The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue and serve process on the defendants in the manner specified by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(1). Process shall consist of the amended complaint, applicable forms and this Entry. Copies Mailed. **SEE ENTRY**. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/18/2015.(MGG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
